The Fishing and Marine Industry Daily News Feed

Fact Or Fiction: Dispelling Myths About Barotrauma, Venting And Descending

by Nick Haddad
Return ‘Em Right Sustainable Fisheries Communications Manager

New regulations for venting and descending reef fish have sparked conversation and controversy across the Gulf of Mexico. From Facebook fishing groups to online forums and on-the-water fodder, everyone seems to be an expert when it comes to releasing fish. With opinions circulating faster than a frigate diving for food, it’s important to get the facts straight so we can do our best to help fish survive release. Let’s dive right into some of the common myths about barotrauma, venting and descending.

Myth 1: Just pop the swim bladder sticking out of the mouth.

This prevalent misunderstanding about barotrauma has circulated for years. Most fishermen are aware that reef fish have a swim bladder that expands when reeled to the surface from depth. Many assume the organ sticking out of the mouth of a fish is the inflated swim bladder, but in reality, the swim bladder expands internally and pushes the stomach out of the mouth of the fish. This is known as stomach eversion. Anglers may see some stomach contents expelled upon ascent or near the mouth of the fish when stomach eversion occurs. Another example is when a snapper bites their own everted stomach “deflating” it, yet there is still air in the body cavity from the swim bladder expanding. You never want to pop the stomach coming out of the mouth as it can do more harm than good for the fish and doesn’t successfully release the gases in the body cavity.

Moral of the Story: If you choose to vent fish (although descending is preferred under most scenarios), ensure you are venting the correct spot behind the pectoral fin!
venting and descending

Myth 2: Descending devices spoon-feed sharks and dolphins.

This argument primarily arises from anglers having their catch eaten while fighting it to the surface, commonly referred to as depredation.
If you are an avid offshore angler, more likely than not you’ve reeled up a half of a fish before. The simple truth is that a fish being descended acts nothing like a fish fighting for its life on the way up. Sharks are attracted to the vibrations and struggle of a fish fighting to survive and get off the hook. Spearfishermen are aware of this as you are more likely to have your fish eaten by a predator when it is struggling on the shaft rather than when you gain control of the fish.

If the subjective evidence isn’t enough for you, let’s look at some data:

  • Runde et al. (2022) examined depredation on descending devices off the coast of North Carolina by descending fish in capture depths of 24 to 244 meters. Of 1,176 non-videoed descents, zero descending devices were lost to predators. Of 114 videoed descents, predators were observed seven times with zero instances of depredation observed. (
  • Researchers from Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant are teaming up with charter captains across the Gulf of Mexico to examine depredation of descended reef fish with GoFishCams attached to the line. Through one season of data collection, seven captains descended 464 fish with an average capture depth of 114 feet. The team examined the video footage and found one instance of depredation by a shark, one predation event after release by a dolphin and the rest were successful releases, including a few with predators in the frame. These results are preliminary as the study is ongoing. (

You’d be naïve to say that sharks, barracudas, dolphins, or other predators will never eat descended fish, but it’s much rarer than on ascent and not a reason to dismiss descending devices. If the sharks are fired up under your boat, you’re unlikely to get a fish to the surface anyway and moving spots is the best course of action. Dealing with predators is one issue while barotrauma and discard mortality is an entirely separate issue.

Keep your finger on the fishing industry pulse

The Definititive News Source of the Fishing & Marine Industry